(The best word processor can only output garbare in terms of layout, typography, orthographical correctness and content if it is not used the way it should be, and, on the other hand, a mechanical typewriter can output a document where nobody will find any reason to complain if it is used correctly.) And it will not prevent users from putting a RAR archive that contains a video into a “Word” document and export it to HTML to e-mail it to somebody else, saying “Look at this video clip I found!” 🙂Īs always, typography isn’t really one of MICROS~1 strengths, even if they develop something that should be used on Mac OS which is the top system for professional DTP and typesetting. In most cases, it’s the user who determines the look of a document, not the word processor used.
“The most important aspect is that the new Word produces really nice looking documents and that is a big plus in my eyes.”īut this will not prevent users without any clue to produce documents that look like crap.
